A Bill of Rights for Incoming Firsthand Answers
An enforced bill of rights for firsthand answers in the age of AI will exponentially impact both human rights and civil rights. Have you ever considered what happens to the answers you give to clarify and to help solve problems? The chain of custody and policies for handling first-party answers is vital to organizing, advocacy, and solving problems.
The legal system must play a more defined role in protecting
incoming firsthand answers because the answers could very well be the answers
that bring closure, awareness, and maybe a solution. Biased handling of
incoming firsthand answers has a history of damaging the trust and expectancy
of the individuals that have reached out or spoke up. It is our experience that
part of aligning people who are new or who have justified distrust in groups is
to add transparency, remove barriers and increase the incentives. Voluntary
compliance and legal enforcement have both worked good together.
The law has always known that firsthand answers matter.
Interceptions, injections and manipulation of firsthand answers is legendary.
It is time for the law to catch up and support the crafting of a Bill of Rights
to make the protection of firsthand answers clearer and enforceable.
Comments
Post a Comment